AW: [time-nuts] Cesium DOES Drift, not
brooke at pacific.net
Wed Apr 20 17:23:47 EDT 2005
I don't have a degaussing device. Are the plans to make one available?
Thanks for the idea,
Brooke Clarke, N6GCE
w/o Java http://www.pacificsites.com/~brooke/PRC68COM.shtml
Hubert v. Bonhorst wrote:
>Just another idea
>Might be the Cs tube is just going to stabilize its magnetic field. Is there
>any possibility to degauss the tube, like with the 5061 high performance
>tube? This could be a very small drift/day.
>Von: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] Im
>Auftrag von Brooke Clarke
>Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. April 2005 21:01
>An: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>Betreff: Re: [time-nuts] Cesium DOES Drift, not
>Is there something I can to do check for control loop failure?
>Chuck Harris wrote:
>>Bill Hawkins wrote:
>>>How about this:
>>>Brooke is watching the last of his cesium evaporate.
>>I don't think so, that appears as greater and greater phase noise.
>>I think Brooke is watching his control loop fail. Cs doesn't drift,
>>that is why it is a primary standard.
>>>From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com]On
>>>Behalf Of Brooke Clarke
>>>Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:33 AM
>>>To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement;
>>>richard at karlquist.com
>>>Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Cesium DOES Drift, not
>>time-nuts mailing list
>>time-nuts at febo.com
More information about the time-nuts