[time-nuts] How Rubidiums make their frequency
Matt Ettus
boyscout at gmail.com
Wed Apr 19 15:55:01 EDT 2006
Since we can now make DDS's with arbitrary frequency resolution, could
you make an Rb oscillator without the magnetic field adjustment?
Wouldn't that reduce a source of error in frequency? Then we'd be
left with the ideal resonance frequency, right?
Are there any other influences on the resonance frequency? I assume
temperature and density don't matter.
Matt
On 4/19/06, Tom Clark, K3IO (ex W3IWI) <K3IO at verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> Christopher Hoover asked:
>
> one issue remains: i have to crank the magnetic field setting almost to
> its high limit (9.91/10.00) to get 5 MHz out; lower settings give a
> frequency that is too low. i presume this is unusual.
>
> i have a rudimentary understanding of the rubidium oscillator physics, but i
> do not understand what would cause this. can i buy a clue?
>
>
> I don't know the Tracor, but I imagine it is like most of the other
> Rubidiums in it's innards.
> Inside the physics package of a Rb, a cell with some Rubidium is
> heated to (that's why Rb's run not!) enough so that it is turned into
> a gas. Both light and microwaves illuminate the cell. If no magnetic
> field is present on the cell, the Rb gas has a hyperfine resonance
> (the difference in frequency between two infrared transitions of the
> Rb gas) at 6.8346826128 Mhz. When a magnetic field is imposed, the
> energy difference between the two hyperfine states changes.
> In the RF part of the signal path (here, the block digram of a typical
> Rb standard helps. See Page 3 of [1]this Symmetricom White Paper .)
> Let's start with some convenient oscillator at, let's say 10 MHz.
> Multiply it up to 60 MHz and then hit a Step Recovery Diode to get the
> 114th harmonic at 6840 MHz.
> Then difference between the 6834.. and 6840 MHz is 5.31738+ MHz. In
> the standard Rb configuration, we apply a magnetic "C-field" to bring
> the difference frequency upwards by 4.89 kHz to 5.31250000 MHz which
> happens to be 5MHz + 5/16MHz. Back in the early days, we didn't have
> nice programmable DDS chips, but simple dividers/multipliers could
> make the 5/16 MHz "adder".
> So what you are doing by tweaking the magnetic field to shift the RF
> resonance of the Rb cell so that it matches the arithmetic "quirk"
> that the 6834 MHz is almost contains the neat 5/16 MHz in the tail-end
> digits.
> Hope that helped -- 73, Tom
>
> References
>
> 1. http://www.symmttm.com/pdf/Precision_Frequency_References/wp_mmrfs.pdf
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list
> time-nuts at febo.com
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list