[time-nuts] PLL Phase Noise vs. Divider Jitter

Magnus Danielson cfmd at bredband.net
Sat Jul 8 13:39:57 EDT 2006


From: "Stephan Sandenbergh" <stephan at rrsg.ee.uct.ac.za>
Subject: [time-nuts] PLL Phase Noise vs. Divider Jitter
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 17:34:36 +0200
Message-ID: <000001c6a2a4$0546f370$401c9e89 at Stephan>

> Hi All,

Stephan,

You keep on posing various questions! Keep it up! ;O)

> In the previous thread, "HP 58540A Phase Noise Improvements", Matt Ettus
> noted the following: 
> 
> The jitter that is added by a divider would most probably pose a greater
> limit to the phase noise of the PLL than that of the specific OCXO used.  

This sounds a little strange. Most of the jitter will be filtered out by the
PLL loop filter. Since we discuss OCXO we are discussing fairly moderate
frequencies (5-20 MHz) and acheiving low jitter dividers should not be a
problem.

> Now my question: How can one divide a digital signal without using jittery
> flip-flop based counters (either discrete of those found in FPGAs)? The
> first thing that springs to mind is that of the analog pulse stretchers
> which were discussed last month. This may provide one with lower jitter but
> it would most probably increase the longer term instabilities due to
> temperature and power supply variations. What are there other alternatives?

One trick of trade is to user a cheap divider to run the division state, and
then use a DFF clocked by the input signal to sample the state-bit from the
divider and then the jitter addition will only be from that DFF. You can spend
the extra care and money on that DFF only.

Cheers,
Magnus



More information about the time-nuts mailing list