[time-nuts] Why Cesium and Rubidium only

Bob Paddock bob.paddock at gmail.com
Fri Jul 27 07:49:12 EDT 2007

On Friday 27 July 2007 04:14, Dr Bruce Griffiths wrote:

> 22GHz, 
> (15GHz)
> (~40.5 GHz) than either the caesium
> (9.192GHz) or rubidium   
> (6.8GHz)

Anything happening in the THz range, that anyone knows of?

 http://www.softwaresafety.net/ http://www.designer-iii.com/

More information about the time-nuts mailing list