[time-nuts] LORAN-C Programmatic environmental Impact Statement (PEIS)?

Poul-Henning Kamp phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Tue Jul 31 01:31:36 EDT 2007

In message <20070730.224033.-1233411867.cfmd at bredband.net>, Magnus Danielson writes:
>); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
>Errors-To: time-nuts-bounces+phk=phk.freebsd.dk at febo.com RETRY
>From: Rob Kimberley <rk at timing-consultants.com>
>Subject: Re: [time-nuts] LORAN-C Programmatic environmental Impact Statement (PEIS)?
>Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:59:46 +0100
>Message-ID: <E1IE08o-00037f-3r at febo.com>
>> If Galileo flies!
>No, in this context it is when Galileo flies. If Galileo flies Loran-C support
>is certainly dead as the service is being acheived with needed goverement
>control where as if Galileo does not flies then there are some arguments to
>continuue Loran-C futher.

You should read the ERNP draft, it points out that LORAN-C is the best investment
of all conceiveable systems.

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

More information about the time-nuts mailing list