# [time-nuts] 5370B problem

SAIDJACK at aol.com SAIDJACK at aol.com
Sat Jun 23 05:40:21 EDT 2007

```Hi,

on the nanosecond-scale jumps I see, I attached an actual measurement in
which you can clearly see the full-nanosecond jumps with only single-digit
picosecond noise. The output rate is about 8 measurements per second:

TI = 1.38230000000E-08
TI = 1.38290000000E-08
TI =  1.38190000000E-08
TI = 1.28270000000E-08
TI = 1.18240000000E-08
TI =  1.28210000000E-08
TI = 1.38280000000E-08
TI = 1.08360000000E-08
TI =  1.28240000000E-08
TI = 8.82600000000E-09
TI = 1.08300000000E-08
TI =  1.38240000000E-08
TI = 1.38180000000E-08
TI = 1.28220000000E-08

You can even see the unit switch scale correctly going from 1.2824E-08 to
8.826E-09. Note that the picosecond range only changed by two picoseconds, but
the nanosecond range jumped a full 4 nanoseconds.

And this is a "good" sequence in comparison. Note that only the single
picosecond digits are changing due to noise(!):

TI = 1.28240000000E-08
TI = 1.28240000000E-08
TI =  1.28260000000E-08
TI = 1.28250000000E-08
TI = 1.28260000000E-08
TI =  1.28210000000E-08
TI = 1.28230000000E-08
TI = 1.28260000000E-08
TI =  1.28230000000E-08
TI = 1.28220000000E-08
TI = 1.28280000000E-08
TI =  1.28290000000E-08
TI = 1.28240000000E-08
TI = 1.28250000000E-08

Side-note: I do really like the single-digits RMS noise at 8
samples-per-second  for it means better than 1E-012 per  second noise-floor :) I can only
achieve this single-digit picosecond noise  with my FTS-4050 against the Fury,
the PRS-10 is much more noisy.

I just wish the unit wouldn't jump around in the nanosecond digits.

Again this is with 100 averages, +-TI mode, FTS-4050 Cesium 10MHz against
Fury GPSDO 10MHz.

Does anyone have any ideas how to fix the issue?

thanks,
bye,
Said

************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
```