[time-nuts] OT: RE: Scanning darkly

[Palfreyman, Jim L]

I've recently put a heap of work in for my family reunion and part of
that was capturing old photographs, newspaper articles and newspaper
photos.

I used a Pentax SLR with a Pentax 50mm 1.4 lens (which is an excellent
lens BTW) and got fantastic results with all media and minimal post
processing (just light and dark levels). It's a 6MP camera and I was
even using jpg.

Just trying to keep it simple - worked for me.

Regards,


Jim Palfreyman
>_______________________________________________
Process Specialist, Capability & Performance
Telstra Services - Commercial Management
http://www.in.telstra.com.au/ism/org747
>Phone:   03 6223 9901 
Fax:          1800 809 786

>This communication may contain CONFIDENTIAL information of Telstra
Corporation Limited (ABN 33 051 775 556).  If you are not an intended
recipient, you MUST NOT keep, forward, copy, use, save or rely on this
communication and any such action is unauthorised and prohibited.  If
you have received this communication in error, please reply to this
e-mail to notify the sender of its incorrect delivery, and then delete
both it and your reply. Thank you.
>

-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Hudler [mailto:jack at hudler.org] 
Sent: Monday, 14 May 2007 4:01 PM
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Scanning darkly

You'd get the same results in the end, only now you've added projection
reconstruction.

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
Behalf Of Palfreyman, Jim L
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 12:44 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Scanning darkly

If all the others' suggestions fail, try photographing with a decent
digital camera. SLR preferably. 


Jim Palfreyman

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts at febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts