[time-nuts] Fw: Austron 2100F

Stanley Reynolds stanley_reynolds at yahoo.com
Thu Jun 12 14:41:40 EDT 2008

If I divide one of the phase corrected outputs to PPS and use it instead of a gps receiver to discipline the input reference crystal oscillator would this system have any advantage over the corrected outputs? I did find a web reference where NASA was using a 2100 receiver to discipline a Austron 2010B reference as part of a triple redundant clock (GPS, Loran-C, and Cesium beam).

----- Original Message ----
From: Dan Rae <danrae at verizon.net>
To: Stanley Reynolds <stanley_reynolds at yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:23:35 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Austron 2100F

Stanley Reynolds wrote:
> Yes, would like to know about the phase corrected outputs, any specs, 
> are they close to the accuracy of the Loran signal it's self ?
Nothing claimed in the specs. It just says: "Square wave output, will 
drive 1 standard TTL load" for both 1 and 10 MHz.  Long term, I'm 
guessing it approaches that of the Loran signal.

It looks like the no suffix version is a bit different from the others.


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 

More information about the time-nuts mailing list