[time-nuts] ADEV secondary standard
Bruce Griffiths
bruce.griffiths at xtra.co.nz
Thu Nov 13 22:05:36 UTC 2008
Jeffrey Pawlan wrote:
> You have just described the current preferred method used by NIST for
> calibrating phase noise measurements.
>
>
>
I know, if the phase noise spectrum is known then ADEV can be calculated
from it , if the ADEV measurement system frequency response is known.
The questions are:
1) Is there a better method?
2) Are there any unanticipated problems with the method?
When testing indirect methods of measuring ADEV such a standard would be
useful for checking the measurement system and its algorithms.
Bruce
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list