[time-nuts] Characterising frequency standards
sar10538 at gmail.com
Mon Apr 13 18:49:17 UTC 2009
2009/4/13 Magnus Danielson <magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org>:
>> But randomly throwing out data points would introduce ZDT.
> It would introduce dead-time, it would not introduce zero dead-time
> (ZDT). Dropping every second sample of a phase/time-error series can
> maintain the zero dead-time property, but you loose the resolution for
> higher taus.
First rule of posting, engage brain before typing :-) Yes, of course
you are right Magnus and that was what I really meant.
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV & G8KVD & JAKDTTNW
Omnium finis imminet
More information about the time-nuts