[time-nuts] Broken Ovenaire OSC 85-50
Mike Monett
xde-l2g3 at myamail.com
Fri Jul 3 19:31:01 UTC 2009
(This is a repost to see if I can figure out why the original was
scrubbed. Sorry for the duplicate.)
> An update on the Broken Ovenaire OSC 85-50.
> I prepared a 'schematic' of the Output Board and the Oscillator
> Board (attached) and I have lots of pictures of the external unit
> and the insides if anyone is interested.
> I resoldered all connections and replaced all transistors on the
> Output Board and the Oscillator Board all to no benefit. I
> measured all the components with an LCR meter and found the 0.01
> uF bypass on the 330 ohm resistor in the emitter circuit of the
> output transistor of the Output Board to be low and with a high
> ESR. I replaced this with about a 20% increase in output amplitude
> but still inadequate. I replaced the rest of the 0.01 uF caps on
> the output board with no additional benefit. I transiently
> disconnected the Red wires from the Oven Controller board and
> there was no increase in output or significant increase in voltage
> to the Oscillator Board.
> Therefore, it appeared that a 'low output crystal' (if such a
> thing exists) was the only logical explanation that I could come
> up with. That seeming to be the case, there appeared to be only 4
> options. 1. Toss the OCXO (sorry, too much effort so far). 2.
> Build an external amplifier (seemingly too much additional
> effort). 3. Try to adjust on the bias of the oscillator transistor
> to achieve a higher output (seemed too 'iffy'). Or 4. Lower the
> value of the resistor in the emitter circuit of the Oscillator
> Board to get more gain out of the last stage in the Oscillator
> Board.
> I replaced the 470 ohm resistor with a 47 ohm resistor and the
> amplitude increased to about 0.4 V P-P into a 50 ohm load and was
> sufficient to make it a usable OCXO again.
> I reassembled, resealed with Epoxy and all seems well so far.
> If anyone wants pictures or other info, please let me know.
> Thanks for all the suggestions and help.
> Joe
Joe,
Congratulations on getting your system to work!
A couple of things. First, trying to measure the currents in the
circuit with a ferrite toroid won't do you much good. You don't know
what the currents should be, and the secondary of the toroid
transformer requires a termination resistor. The value changes with
the turns ratio.
Just from looking at the circuit, the RF currents will be extremely
low. This requires a large number of turns on the secondary, which
will probably resonate at or below the 10MHz operating frequency due
to stray capacitance from the connection to the scope. So it is
unlikely you will get any useful progress in this direction.
However, from the values on your schematic, the output tank circuit
resonates at 9.602MHz with a Q of 9.6. So the tank is already well
below resonance, which attenuates the output voltage.
Any stray capacitance you add to the circuit will bring the resonant
frequency lower, further aggravating the loss in signal.
The output tank is tapped with the 75pF and 91pF in series. This
further attenuates the signal.
I'd change the circuit to a single capacitor across the tank with a
small trim capacitor to tune it to resonance.
To get the signal into 50 ohms for distribution, I'd add a limiter
if you can tolerate a square wave output, or a good emitter follower
if you need a sine wave. Take the output from the collector of the
2N2369 to get the maximum signal amplitude.
Your original post mentions an output amplitude of 20mV. If the
normal amplitude is around 2V, this represents a loss of 40dB. This
is a huge loss in signal. The circuit obviously worked at one time,
so there may well be some other hidden problem.
It is possible the crystal is damaged, but this seems unlikely. A
crystal oscillator probably won't even start if the signal level is
down 40dB.
You can check the oscillator and crystal in SPICE. Normally, the
high Q of the crystal will make the analysis very slow. It could
take many hours for the simulation to begin oscillating and
stabilize at the final amplitude. The transient analysis requires a
very fine time step for accuracy, and you could run out of memory
before the simulation was complete.
I have developed a much faster way of analyzing a crystal oscillator
in SPICE. Instead of requiring tens or hundreds of thousands of
simulated cycles, this method gives accurate results in only a few
dozen cycles. For more information, please see "SPICE Analysis of
Crystal Oscillators"
http://pstca.com/spice/xtal/clapp.htm
You can estimate the value of the crystal ESR by finding the Q of
your crystal and working backwards.
I'm attaching a gif of your schematic for reference. This is rotated
90 degrees and enhanced in LView Pro to improve the contrast.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Mike
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list