[time-nuts] PIC Divider Performance (was Re: time-nuts Digest, Vol 56, Issue 71)
Ulrich Bangert
df6jb at ulrich-bangert.de
Tue Mar 31 07:20:34 UTC 2009
Gents,
after the discussion of the pic pps divider's properties let me add that on
http://www.ulrich-bangert.de/html/downloads.html
you can find a version of the pps divider that has been adopted to the Atmel
AVR Mega world. Two versions are available, one uses port A and a second
uses port D for the outputs. In contrast to the original design the 100 kHz
output has a near perfect 1:1 duty cycle. In the zips you find complete
WinAVR projects.
Best regards
Ulrich Bangert
> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com
> [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] Im Auftrag von Poul-Henning Kamp
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Marz 2009 07:30
> An: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Betreff: Re: [time-nuts] PIC Divider Performance (was Re:
> time-nuts Digest,Vol 56, Issue 71)
>
>
> In message <49D16637.60502 at febo.com>, John Ackermann N8UR writes:
>
> >Therefore, the PIC divider is a bit above the 5370B noise floor, but
> >not much.
>
> Many years ago, I did a similar experiment, but to eliminate
> the timebases from the measurement I used the PPS output as
> start and the 10MHz input frequency as stop.
>
> That way only the delay & jitter of the PPSDIV is measured (+
> cables & counters obviously).
>
> The result were of similar magnitude.
>
> Poul-Henning
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by
> incompetence.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list