[time-nuts] Msg to N.Z. time nuts
Russell Rezaian
rrezaian at motorola.com
Tue May 19 20:15:39 UTC 2009
At 12:58 PM -0700 2009/05/19, Hal Murray wrote:
>USB has a bad reputation, but I think it's way way overblown. Yes, it's
>polled, but that polling is done in hardware and the time scale is 1 ms. If
>you are satisfied with an accuracy of a few 10s of ms, USB works fine. The
>problem is the GPS unit.
And I can confirm that for my very un-scientific experiments I do get
a pretty consistent time sync around 1 MS plus or minus mark from a
USB serial port adapter in best case conditions. That's with no
special work on a pretty stock consumer grade computer with an off
the shelf USB to serial port.
Even my worst case machine where I expect horrible USB performance
(busy USB 1.x port with other devices, and a CPU that runs at 100%
busy for extended periods of time) I find I things never seem to go
worse than +-50 ms. Not great, but much better than I was expecting
based on some of the things I had read.
All my tests done with a time oriented GPS receiver.
--
Russell
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list