[time-nuts] The Demise of LORAN (was Re: Reference oscillator accuracy)

Magnus Danielson magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org
Sun Nov 15 23:46:17 UTC 2009


Chuck,

Chuck Harris wrote:
> What makes you think it needs to be CW, and cannot be pulsed and
> chirped?

May I roll in a noise jammer into the debate?

> All it has to do is confuse the receiver enough so that you can't
> trust its readings.

Depends on the goal. For some strategies, blackout is the goal, for some 
getting the readings go haywire every once in a while suffice.

Cheers,
Magnus



More information about the time-nuts mailing list