[time-nuts] The Demise of LORAN (was Re: Reference oscillator accuracy)
Magnus Danielson
magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org
Sun Nov 15 23:46:17 UTC 2009
Chuck,
Chuck Harris wrote:
> What makes you think it needs to be CW, and cannot be pulsed and
> chirped?
May I roll in a noise jammer into the debate?
> All it has to do is confuse the receiver enough so that you can't
> trust its readings.
Depends on the goal. For some strategies, blackout is the goal, for some
getting the readings go haywire every once in a while suffice.
Cheers,
Magnus
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list