[time-nuts] Rubidium standard / MTBF

Bob Camp lists at cq.nu
Thu Nov 19 22:59:23 UTC 2009


Hi

One of the reasons we use 10 to 20 year old designs in the space products is that we know they'll work for 10 to 20 years ....

Bob

On Nov 19, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Lux, Jim (337C) wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On 11/19/09 4:56 AM, "Bob Camp" <lists at cq.nu> wrote:
> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> The one that I find the most shocking is the very major internet hardware
>> company that considers 5 years of continuos use to be the goal. The logic - we
>> want them to swap out the gear regularly....
> 
> That's actually reasonable.. Moore's law is always advancing, performance is
> improving, and regular swaps avoid needing to support old versions for long
> times.  A pretty simple financial analysis shows what the optimum plan would
> be, and I'm sure that's what the MIHC does.
> 
> We face the opposite issue at JPL.. Supporting 20 year old hardware in space
> (which is pretty benign) or more to the point some ground testbed that
> replicates it.  The flight hardware or prototype probably isn't the problem,
> it's the Apple II computer hooked up to it in the testbed that gives you
> diagnostic information, or is used to generate the software builds using a
> program that runs on the Microsoft BASIC card installed in that Apple.  (or
> Rocky Mountain Basic on that HP calculator, or...)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
> 




More information about the time-nuts mailing list