[time-nuts] NMEA Time
Lux, Jim (337C)
james.p.lux at jpl.nasa.gov
Wed Nov 25 21:41:57 UTC 2009
> You aren't going to get nanosecond accuracy out of a ntp server running over
> an ethernet[1]. On the other hand, sub-ms isn't hard with a good OS and/or
> good software.
>
> It's fairly easy to get a reasonable sanity check on a (s)ntp server. Just
> setup a known good ntp system and have it monitor the DUT. The reference
> implementation for ntp (http://www.ntp.org/) has lots of support for
> collecting data.
>
> The key step in making a PC keep good time is tweaking the clock frequency.
> This is the software equivalent of the EFC on an oscillator. ntpd calls it
> drift. You can use it as a thermometer.
I don't think the oscillator quality in the typical PC is good enough to ever get nanoseconds, even with tons of tweaks and temperature compensation, etc. The short term variability/phase noise is too high.
Microseconds, I think you could do.
>
> ----------
>
> 1) There is a group working on that level of accuracy. It takes special
> hardware that can put a time-stamp on a packet as it leaves or arrives.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precision_Time_Protocol
>
>
More than just a casual group. You can buy IEEE 1588 products from, among others, Symmetricom.
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list