[time-nuts] Non electrical time-nuttery
Thomas A. Frank
ka2cdk at cox.net
Sat Jan 9 21:10:40 UTC 2010
Rather like the Shortt clock, only magnetically coupled.
Nifty idea.
Tom Frank, KA2CDK
On Jan 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
>
> How about a rotary pendulum on a quartz fiber spring with some kind
> of trick magnets to drive it / read it out? Put the pendulum and
> spring inside an evacuated glass envelope to get around the vacuum
> pump issue. The enclosure could be pretty small.
>
> Drive the magnets with a second external clock, and feedback
> compensate it. Let the external clock do all the readout via a very
> normal gear and pointers system. The trick would be getting the
> feedback loop to work purely mechanically with enough gain to
> "unload" the master pendulum.
>
> Bob
>
>
> On Jan 9, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Lux, Jim (337C) wrote:
>
>> OK.. So we're moving back in electrical technology....
>> But what about mechanical? Could modern technology get a
>> substantial (>order of magnitude) improvement over 19th century
>> chronometers (either pendulum or balance wheel or whatever). I
>> know there's some really good quartz fiber torsional spring
>> schemes, but I think they still need electrical means to keep them
>> moving and to read it out.
>>
>> So how good can one do with a mechanical, hydraulic, (or chemical,
>> I suppose) system? Let's assume it has to have a "direct" readout
>> that is human readable by a causal bystander. (this starts to
>> sound like the 10,000 year clock or whatever it is..)
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/
>> listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
> time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list