[time-nuts] Non electrical time-nuttery

Lux, Jim (337C) james.p.lux at jpl.nasa.gov
Sun Jan 10 19:01:06 UTC 2010




On 1/10/10 9:24 AM, "J.D. Bakker" <jdb at lartmaker.nl> wrote:

> IHNTA, but...
> 
>> [...] readable by a causal bystander.
> 
> ...is one of the most apropos typoes I've ever seen.

Indeed... But it could be right, eh? After all, something in the past led
them to look at the clock and attempt to read it?
> 
> JDB.
> [whose customers are often pushing for acausal filters]
>


Acausal? Or non-causal? Or "reverse causal" (anticausal)




More information about the time-nuts mailing list