[time-nuts] Tight-PLL - YOU DON'T NEED TO READ IT IF YOUR FED-UP WITH THE...

[Steve Rooke]

Perhaps I am responding to the degree of offensiveness and irrelevance
that another member of this list has been posting and it has not been
pointed out to them by the likes of you and such. Perhaps you should
take a balanced approach when you view this whole issue.

My comment about porn was a joke, just in case you had not understood
that. I felt that a smiley was irrelevant with it as my comment was in
the vein that viewing porn would have more value than the pettiness
that another list member has been showing.

Perhaps I'm doing myself no favours in the eyes of SOME here but then
I've tried many ways to deal with this issue and and I'm just working
my way through them. If you don't wish to be a part of this discussion
you may easily delete posts with this subject, you are not forced to
read this but it is interesting to see that some are still reading it
so there must be some interest.

Best regards,
Steve

On 6 June 2010 22:39,  <GandalfG8 at aol.com> wrote:
>
> In a message dated 06/06/2010 09:59:44 GMT Daylight Time,
> sar10538 at gmail.com writes:
>
> So who  has made this assertion, all along it's been understood that
> this was an  improved way of implementing the tight-PLL method. Did you
> not get  that?
>
> Now I'm finding this petty attack on someone else's research,  without
> fully understanding it, quite tiresome, it's seriously cutting into  my
> quality porn time but  won't lay down and play  dead.
>
>
>
> ------------------
> Steve
>
> You're becoming more and more offensive as your contributions continue  and
> it's starting to get unpleasant.
>
> Whether or not one agrees with Warren or Bruce, or in some respects with
> either, tends not to alter the fact that their ongoing discussions via the
> list  are now of questionable value since both are firmly entrenched with
> their own  points of view and neither is ever likely to concede.
>
> Unfortunately, your achievement has been to plumb new depths of
> irrelevance and you do yourself no favours.
>
> It doesn't come across that this is cutting into your porn time, there's
> enough obscenity floating around to suggest you could be living it here and
> now.
>
> PLEASE, give this, and all of us, a well deserved rest.
>
> regards
>
> Nigel
> GM8PZR
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>



-- 
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV & G8KVD
The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once.
- Einstein