[time-nuts] Most accurate small crystal

[Bob Camp]

Hi

There are a raft of papers on each of the sub portions of the fitting
process. Aging, retrace, temperature, and acceleration all have their own
issues and fit approaches. 

The whole "how (and why that way) do they test a chronometer?" is something
there's a lot of papers on as well. Some of them date back into the 1600's.

Where do you want to start?

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
Behalf Of Steve Rooke
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:05 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Most accurate small crystal

Bob,

On 27 May 2010 23:43, Bob Camp <lists at rtty.us> wrote:

> This sort of thing is *very* algorithm friendly. You can correct for a lot
of things after the fact. The results will be a bit variable since it's a
"how lucky did you get" sort of thing. They also will tend to degrade over
time, as the data you initially loaded in on temperature performance, aging,
and G sensitivity departs from reality.

I'm very interested in this area, do you know of any sources of
studies on this topic?

Thanks,
Steve

> Bob

-- 
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV & G8KVD
A man with one clock knows what time it is;
A man with two clocks is never quite sure.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.