[time-nuts] Anyone have a comparison of the Z3805A and a Tbolt?
Rex
rexa at sonic.net
Tue Sep 7 15:55:51 UTC 2010
Bob,
I wonder if you are really talking about Z3805A's?
I know the double-oven version of 10811's were in the earlier Z3801A's;
never heard of one in Z3805A. I have a Z3816A and a Z3805A. They both
have MTI 260-model 5 MHz oscillators. I assume that is the "better" one
you are referring to. My Z3805A is marked Samsung, as are all the ones I
see coming from China.
The current price seems to be more like $350 than $250 for the ones
left. I think $350 is about what I paid for my Z3805A a bit over a year,
or so, back.
-Rex
On 9/7/2010 4:34 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
>
> The "bad units" with the 10811's in them are usually marked "HP". The
> "good units" with the true DOCXO in them are normally marked
> "Symmetricom".
>
> Bob
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Pete Lancashire" <xyzzypdx at gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 6:14 PM
> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
> <time-nuts at febo.com>
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Anyone have a comparison of the Z3805A and a
> Tbolt?
>
>> Is there an external way on the 3805's to id the desired 10811 ? S/N
>> or ?
>> Ditto on the 10811's
>>
>> -pete
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Bob Camp <lists at rtty.us> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I have a couple 3805's and more than a couple TBolts.
>>>
>>> There are two 3805's, one has the double heated 10811 the other has
>>> a true
>>> double oven. The true double oven / later design is the one you want.
>>> Typically they have better TC and better ADEV at 10 seconds compared
>>> to the
>>> earlier part.
>>>
>>> The TBolt has a much better GPS receiver in it and it is far more tweak
>>> able with the Lady Heather software. It's default settings are not
>>> as good
>>> as the defaults on the 3805. With some work they can be vastly
>>> improved.
>>>
>>> The 3805 runs on a single 24 or 48 volt supply depending on the
>>> model you
>>> get. The TBolt needs +12, +5 and -12. Battery backup is easier on
>>> the 3805.
>>>
>>> TBolts run $75 +/- 25. 3805's run $250 +/- $50. Shipping will be a
>>> bit more
>>> on the 3805.
>>>
>>> The TBolt wins in bang for the buck and fun to tweak categories. The
>>> 3805
>>> is the better plug it in and ignore it forever box.
>>>
>>> Both will track a cesium well at 100,000 seconds and beyond. Both
>>> look a
>>> lot like GPS at 100 seconds or so. Both have some significant
>>> variation unit
>>> to unit.
>>>
>>> Bob
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 6, 2010, at 11:13 AM, swingbyte <swingbyte at exemail.com.au>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi All,
>>> > Have been thinking of getting a GPSODO and I'm looking for advice
>>> on > what
>>> to choose. I haven't been able to find an ADEV comparison between
>>> these two
>>> units and am curious to know how their differences manifest themselves.
>>> Apart from the 12 satelites vs 8 what practical advantages are
>>> there in the
>>> 3805A over the Tbolt? With all the extra components there has to be
>>> something. I notice that the ocxo is not the large Docxo of the
>>> 3801A -
>>> which is better?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> >
>>> > Tim
>>> >
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list