[time-nuts] SRS PRS10 problem
shalimr9 at gmail.com
shalimr9 at gmail.com
Thu Feb 17 21:04:14 UTC 2011
I wanted to say "those customers who bought them new directly from them"
While I do not agree with the practice, many companies treat their primary customers better than those who buy aftermarket.
What is relevant is what the vendor believes is relevant. What you and I think about it IS irrelevant.
They do not want to exert control on who owns it later, but they exert control on what they do with their spares.
Its a fact of life.
Didier KO4BB
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: Magnus Danielson <magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org>
Sender: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:26:41
To: <time-nuts at febo.com>
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
<time-nuts at febo.com>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SRS PRS10 problem
On 02/17/2011 12:23 PM, shalimr9 at gmail.com wrote:
> It sucks, but they may only have a small qty of the spares, and they keep them for those customers who paid full price.
Full price?
Someone payed full price for it originally. The notion that can have
control over who owns it later is strange and not relevant. Sending it
to them for repairs may be possible thought.
Cheers,
Magnus
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list