[time-nuts] Worst possible error on a rubidium

[Will Matney]

Here is another link to the catalog on these FEI standards, and it has info
that the datasheet leaves out, especially on operation.

http://www.freqelec.com/pdf/rfs_12pg.pdf

Best,

Will

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 7/13/2011 at 6:27 PM Will Matney wrote:

>David,
>
>Below is a link to the datasheet on the FEI 5680A. I hope it will work
with
>those %20 in the link. If not, I think there simply blank spaces, or /FEI
-
>5680A.pdf
>
>http://www.gillam-fei.be/products/pdf/others/rubidium/FEI%20-%205680A.pdf
>
>Best,
>
>Will
>
>*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
>
>On 7/13/2011 at 5:24 PM Will Matney wrote:
>
>>David,
>>
>>That's a good question, and I wouldn't be able to say, without seeing the
>>spec sheet on the oscillator itself.  Out of lock would be out of
>>tolernace, but what the maximum allowable deviation is, on the unit in
>>question, I wouldn't know. If it does finally lock, it should be within
>>tolerance, but what that tolernaces maximum deviation is, it's untelling,
>>without seeing some literature on it.
>>
>>I did have a sheet on the one I bought, and if I can find it, I'll see
>what
>>it says.
>>
>>Best,
>>
>>Will
>>
>>*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
>>
>>On 7/13/2011 at 10:15 PM Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>>
>>>If an old random 10 MHz Rubidium oscillator is working (i.e. powers up,
>>and 
>>>eventually locks), what is the maximum possible frequency error it could
>>have?
>>>
>>>Could it remained locked with an error of 1 part in 10^7, 10^8, 10^9,
>>10^10 etc?
>>>
>>>I assume there are physical limits which would simply stop it
functioning
>>too 
>>>far from the correct frequency, but don't have much clue what they are.
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
>>>Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>>>A: Top-posting.
>>>Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>>>To unsubscribe, go to
>>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>and follow the instructions there.
>>>
>>>__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
>>signature database 5851 (20110206) __________
>>>
>>>The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>>
>>>http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>>To unsubscribe, go to
>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>and follow the instructions there.
>>
>>__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
>signature database 5851 (20110206) __________
>>
>>The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>
>>http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>and follow the instructions there.
>
>__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 5851 (20110206) __________
>
>The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
>http://www.eset.com