[time-nuts] Worst possible error on a rubidium

Bob Camp lists at rtty.us
Thu Jul 14 20:56:21 UTC 2011


Hi

At least 90% of the units worked fine. Of the other 10% some of the issues
were pretty minor. I only have seen one or two that would not lock. 

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
Behalf Of Dr. David Kirkby
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 4:47 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Worst possible error on a rubidium

On 07/14/11 01:27 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've looked at a random sample of a couple dozen Rb's that are in the 5 to
> 30 year old range. In about 90% of the cases I'm reasonably certain they
> haven't been adjusted since they left the factory. If they still worked,
> they all came in at or below +/- 3x10^-9.
>
> Bob

Thank you.

Of the couple of dozen, how many worked? Clearly if only two worked, the
data is 
not very useful. But if 15 or more worked, then it's interesting. It would
give 
me reasonable confidence the unit is sufficient for my needs without
bothering 
with calibration.

I do have a friend with a GPS locked rubidium. At some point I'll get the
unit 
to him, but I recently sold my HP 5370B to someone on this list (regretting
I 
sold it now!)

I guess a scope would be OK to check for gross errors by one 10 MHz signal
to 
the X input and another to the Y input.


-- 
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.




More information about the time-nuts mailing list