[time-nuts] Fast than light neutrino

Javier Herrero jherrero at hvsistemas.es
Fri Sep 23 12:02:30 UTC 2011


nr 2 = nr 3 is an assumption? I was thinking that it is a definition :)

Regards,

Javier

El 23/09/2011 13:33, Poul-Henning Kamp escribió:
> In message<4E7C6BB7.1020207 at hvsistemas.es>, Javier Herrero writes:
>
> BTW:  Just something to think about:
>
> There are three quantities involved here, and most of the coverage
> and quite a lot of physicists overlook that:
>
> 1. Speed of neutrinos
>
> 2. Speed of photons
>
> 3. Constant 'c' From relativity.
>
> Until now the assumption have been that 2 = 3, but this is only
> an assumption, based on the fact that we had no measurements that
> said otherwise.
>
> If 1>  3, as most press-coverage seems to posit, because they forgot
> the above is an assumption, then both the standardmodel and relativity
> is in trouble.
>
> If 3>= 1>  2, then only the standard model is in trouble, relativity
> unaffected.
>



More information about the time-nuts mailing list