[time-nuts] 1 pps correction

Azelio Boriani azelio.boriani at screen.it
Sun Apr 1 11:07:57 UTC 2012


Said,
how complex is your 20pS time interval counter? Is it analog, FPGA,
something else (if you can disclose some info, of course)?

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net>wrote:

>
> martyn at ptsyst.com said:
> > I’ve seen that the peak to peak jitter is reduced from something like 27
> ns
> > to < 10 ns.
>
> > Is this a reduction of just the jitter, or is the actual accuracy to UTC
> > also improved by this amount.
>
> Have you read the hanging-bridges paper?
>  Tom Clark and Rick Hambly: Timing for VLBI
>  http://gpstime.com/files/tow-time2009.pdf
> I think that is the key to understanding this area.
>
> If you could average over many sawtooth cycles, you should get an accurate
> answer.
>
> The problem is that you don't get to pick how many cycles fit into your
> averaging time.  The sawtooth pattern is the beat between two frequencies.
> One of them is drifting with time/temperature.  If you are unlucky, the
> beat
> frequency can be very very low.
>
> The sawtooth correction lets you correct on a cycle-by-cycle basis.  You
> don't need to average over many samples.
>
>
> --
> These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>


More information about the time-nuts mailing list