[time-nuts] Chinese Scopes (was: Re: LORAN-C at MIT)

[J. Forster]

IMO, the place you really need >2-4 channels is logic analyzers, not 'scopes.

YMMV,

-John

================



> On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
> "J. Forster" <jfor at quikus.com> wrote:
>
>> I would actually like to know why many seem to feel that a 500 MHz
>> analog
>> 'scope is not "good enough" for what you really do in your lab?
>
> Well... if i had a 500MHz analog scope, i wouldnt want anything better..
> ok, well maybe the storage function of DSO's is nice, but other than
> that, i don't need much more and for home use i'd be happy with a 500MHz
> analog... but, the only scope i have is a 2 channel 50MHz one. I definitly
> could have a use for two more channels and a bit of more bandwidth.
> The rest is nice to have.
>
> 			Attila Kinali
>
> --
> Why does it take years to find the answers to
> the questions one should have asked long ago?
>
>