[time-nuts] GPS, USGS Early Earthquake Warning

Mark Spencer mspencer12345 at yahoo.ca
Sat Apr 28 23:50:58 UTC 2012



In the early 1980's  I visited the dominion radio astronomy observatory in Canada.    I observed a bunker like structure and asked my host what it contained, he advised me that it housed a special seismograph that would only be of use in the event of a large earth quake.

Sent from my iPod

On 2012-04-28, at 3:53 PM, Brooke Clarke <brooke at pacific.net> wrote:

> Hi Tom:
> 
> They do use two different seismometers at each location, a large movement and a sensitive.
> http://www.prc68.com/I/Seismometer.shtml
> 
> Have Fun,
> 
> Brooke Clarke
> http://www.PRC68.com
> http://www.end2partygovernment.com/Clarke4Congress.html
> 
> 
> Tom Van Baak wrote:
>> Brooke,
>> 
>> Right, an overloaded accelerometer is a problem -- if you have
>> only one or a few of them.
>> 
>> But the beauty of using cellular sites is that you have hundreds
>> or thousands of them across populated areas; so it's no problem
>> if the a bunch of sensors near the epicenter overload. A clipped
>> signal is not worthless; at least you know something big happened
>> there; you can rely on slightly more distant cell tower sensors to
>> get readings a few seconds later that are less clipped or not clipped
>> at all. (There's another solution I heard about -- using smartphones
>> as a tiered network of synchronized accelerometers).
>> 
>> A high rate GPS solution sounds really cool to me but I bet its also
>> far more expensive.
>> 
>> Related to that, are there any seismometer experts on the list? I've
>> always wondered why they don't augment the extremely sensitive
>> detectors with less sensitive detectors? Of course a really good
>> detector will overload; so just co-locate cheap detectors that are 40
>> and 80 dB less sensitive. That way you get a clean signal no matter
>> how close or far the epicenter is from the detector.
>> 
>> /tvb
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brooke Clarke" <brooke at pacific.net>
>> To: "Tom Van Baak" <tvb at LeapSecond.com>; "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts at febo.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 2:49 PM
>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS, USGS Early Earthquake Warning
>> 
>> 
>>> Hi Tom:
>>> 
>>> The USGS talk was the first time I'd heard about the need to look at an earthquake as happening along some length of fault line.  For the big quake in Japan the forecast software assumed a point source for the quake and that cause them to under estimate the magnitude and get other things wrong.  GPS is part of the solution to get better results.
>>> 
>>> In the S. CA example he showed a 180 mile long rupture of the San Andreas fault.  At 2 miles a second the quake would last about 90 seconds.
>>> Accelerometers that are not right on top of the fault will be overloaded with signals coming from each location where there's a fracture and so the data will be nearly impossible to untangle in a short time frame.  But a GPS receiver will show a DC displacement that unambiguous.
>>> 
>>> Have Fun,
>>> 
>>> Brooke Clarke
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.



More information about the time-nuts mailing list