[time-nuts] What's the easiest way to divide by 10 forThunderbolt reference output?
Robert LaJeunesse
rlajeunesse at sbcglobal.net
Wed Jul 25 00:31:09 UTC 2012
A part like any the Cypress PSoC family is much more flexible (but potentially
harder to program) than the PIC because it has hardware blocks that can be
made to do very useful work independent of the processor. The processor can run
on its internal RC oscillator while one digital block would take an external
clock and divide it down by any value up to 256. Like the PIC software is free
and development tools can be had at low cost.
Bob L.
________________________________
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts at febo.com>
Sent: Tue, July 24, 2012 2:51:00 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] What's the easiest way to divide by 10 forThunderbolt
reference output?
> John,
>
> That's interesting to me. What exactly are the actual structural limitations of
>[that] pic?
>
> -CH
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list