[time-nuts] What's the easiest way to divide by 10 forThunderbolt reference output?

Robert LaJeunesse rlajeunesse at sbcglobal.net
Wed Jul 25 00:31:09 UTC 2012


A part like any the Cypress PSoC family is much more flexible (but potentially 
harder to program) than the PIC because it has hardware blocks that can be 
made to do very useful work independent of the processor. The processor can run 
on its internal RC oscillator while one digital block would take an external 
clock and divide it down by any value up to 256. Like the PIC software is free 
and development tools can be had at low cost. 

Bob L.
________________________________
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts at febo.com>
Sent: Tue, July 24, 2012 2:51:00 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] What's the easiest way to divide by 10 forThunderbolt 
reference output?

> John,
> 
> That's interesting to me. What exactly are the actual structural limitations of 
>[that] pic?
> 
> -CH


More information about the time-nuts mailing list