[time-nuts] New atomic clock

Joseph Gray jgray at zianet.com
Tue Mar 13 23:37:24 UTC 2012


Thanks. I missed that discussion. Sometimes, when messages don't look
immediately interesting, or when they stray way off topic, I'm prone
to delete without reading :-) At times the list is very quiet and at
other times too busy to keep up with.

Joe Gray
W5JG

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Attila Kinali <attila at kinali.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:37:02 -0600
> Joseph Gray <jgray at zianet.com> wrote:
>
>> http://www.news.com.au/technology/sci-tech/nucelar-clock-100-times-more-accurate-than-atomic-clock/story-fn5fsgyc-1226297068083#ixzz1osFDYtyb
>>
>> I didn't see a link to a more detailed article. This one tells you
>> almost nothing.
>
> See the thread starting at [1] and especially [2] for a "discussion".
>
>                        Attila Kinali
> [1] http://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2012-March/064837.html
> [2] http://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2012-March/064884.html
>
> --
> Why does it take years to find the answers to
> the questions one should have asked long ago?
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>



More information about the time-nuts mailing list