[time-nuts] Loran again

[J. Forster]

Hmmm... . That puts a different face on it.

If it a LORAN-like signal, but with an eventual format, incompatible with
existing hardware, like the Austron 2100F, any cheering will have been in
vain.

YMMV,

-John

==================




> I understand its no eLORAN, but I keep calling it LORAN and thats actually
> just as wrong.
> Not sure what to call it. It does at least at this point work with the old
> rcvrs.
> It turned off at 2000 UTC Friday it was time for a beer.
> Regards
> Paul.
>
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Magnus Danielson
> <magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org
>> wrote:
>
>> On 02/02/2013 09:34 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Is there any sign that the signal actually *is* eLORAN at this point?
>>>
>>
>> The published spec makes it non eLORAN but rather a new fresher signal.
>>
>> Anyone tried grabbing the new signal?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Magnus
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
>> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts>
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>