[time-nuts] low noise multiplication to 100 MHz
Graham / KE9H
ke9h.graham at gmail.com
Mon Jan 25 12:20:42 EST 2016
There are clock distribution parts designed to do this low noise frequency
conversion and distribution.
Consider TI LMK04100
Ignore PLL1
Put your 10 MHz as the reference input to PLL2.
Set Internal VCO to ~1200 MHz
Set the internal dividers to get 100 MHz out, and 10 MHz back to the PLL2
phase detector.
Get reasonable noise and 100 MHz output with your choice of 2VPECL, LVDS,
LVCMOS output levels.
If you have a dirty input clock/reference, or multiple sources, you can use
PLL1 and an external crystal in a VCO to clean it up before you multiply it
to 1200 MHz.
And you can get up to four other frequencies out of the part at the same
time.
150 fs class jitter.
$13 cost, quantity one.
--- Graham
==
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Bert Kehren via time-nuts <
time-nuts at febo.com> wrote:
> If not good enough an XOR with filter and one of the Crystek VCXO's
> previously mentioned may do it.
> Bert Kehren
>
>
> In a message dated 1/25/2016 10:01:33 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org writes:
>
> Also, it will be systematic, with idle tones. Because of the delay
> elements used, they will not be long-term static but move around.
>
> I agree, this is quite noisy. If the noise is tolerable, it is indeed a
> small solution. 100 ps 1-sigma for 5 MHz in 100 MHz out isn't what I
> would consider low.
>
> https://www.idt.com/document/dst/570-datasheet
>
> Cheers,
> Magnus
>
> On 01/24/2016 11:12 PM, Bruce Griffiths wrote:
> > Unfortunately the ICS570 (like all zero delay buffers) has an output
> jitter approaching about 1000 times the likely RF ADC internal sampling
> jitter. The resultant SNR degradation may be a little excessive for this
> application..
> > Bruce
> >
> >
> > On Monday, 25 January 2016 11:00 AM, Bert Kehren via time-nuts
> <time-nuts at febo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > With all the discussions in a small 100 MHz source I asked my project
> > partner Juerg in Switzerland to run some data on the ICS 570 that we use
> on the
> > majority of our projects with excellent results. Using the HP53132A we
> see
>
> > + - 1 count at E10-11 ignore the large jumps those come from the Tbolt
> > frequency change to correct the 1 pps. Depending on the application
> this is an
> > excellent device.
> > Bert Kehren
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 1/23/2016 6:02:23 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> > dk4xp at arcor.de writes:
> >
> > Am 22.01.2016 um 22:40 schrieb jimlux:
> >> the oscillator is a HCMOS output, so figure swinging about 3.5V
> >> Output.. I'm feeding differential clock inputs on ADCs. I'll bet a
> >> +/- 300mV swing would work.
> >>
> >>> 4)Title said "Low Noise" needs better definition as to what kind of
> >>> noise and how far down. Are we to be concerned about harmonic and
> spur
> >>> content as compared to real random white noise?
> >>
> >> This is time-nuts.. it has to be perfect..
> >>
> >> But realistically, my source is probably going to be about -90dBc/Hz
> >> at 1 Hz, -125 at 10Hz, -145 at 100 Hz. I'm going up by a factor of
> >> 10, so I'd expect 20 dB worse plus a little..(nothing is perfect,
> eh?)
> >>
> >> Call it maybe -100 to -95 at 10 Hz, -125 to -120 at 100 Hz and so
> forth.
> >>
> >> harmonics are interesting: it's the sample clock into an ADC. So
> >> harmonics of the 100 aren't a big deal. harmonics of the 10 or 20
> >> are. If you have significant 90 or 110 contaminating the 100, then
> >> you get weird spurs.. (I had this problem on a software radio where
> >> the 50 MHz sample clock was contaminated with some 66 MHz from the
> CPU)
> >>
> >> Spurs cause the same issues.
> >>
> >> ON the other hand... spurs that are pretty low don't make much
> >> difference if you're digitizing a signal that is close to the noise
> >> floor: the spur multiplied by the desired signal is usually lower and
> >> down in the noise. Strong CW in band signals, though, are a real
> pain.
> >>
> >>
> > <
> >
>
> https://picasaweb.google.com/103357048842463945642/Tronix#607927018804883377
> > 8
> >>
> >
> > I think that top left board would not be far away:
> >
> > in : 10 MHz LVDS or CMOS
> > in: 3V3
> > out: 100 MHz CMOS 3V3
> >
> > just a few hours wall clock time from layout to working as a
> > ham radio weekender, so please excuse my diy home board
> > production process.
> >
> > Ok, the use of a 4046 descendant may not be the last word
> > from a timenut perspective, but I'll redo it with an osc of
> > my own anyway. Divider 100/10 is a LVC163 (161?) + lvc04.
> >
> >
> > < http://www.crystek.com/crystal/spec-sheets/vcxo/CVHD-950.pdf >
> >
> > Digi-Key has 153 of them on a tape and 441 of a similar one , even
> > cheaper that seems to point to the same data sheet.
> >
> > <
> >
>
> http://www.digikey.de/product-detail/de/CVHD-950-100.000/744-1213-ND/1644128
> >
> >>
> > You can get the few dB missing close-in by transfer from your
> reference.
> >
> > In the picture:
> > The bottom row of boards is a doubler 100->200 MHz using 2*BF862,
> slight
> > gain,
> > and diode doubler 200 -> 400 MHz, SAW filter to get rid of
> > 100/200/300/500/600 +/-10 etc,
> > post amp to get a usable level again.
> >
> > Still missing 400-> 800, 800->1600 to feed _my_ ADC clock input..
> >
> > regards, Gerhard
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list