[time-nuts] 5370B Question / help needed

Thomas Allgeier th.allgeier at gmail.com
Wed Jul 5 06:00:35 EDT 2017

Thanks all for your help and suggestions - I've been off grid for the last 
few days.
I will look into the dust/contacts issue first, and sweat up on the manual 
and archive posts in relation to the adjustment procedure.
Then I will try to see how far this gets me and report back - watch this 
space as they say.

I may well need the extender cards but since I am based in the UK shipment 
would have to be considered. Probably worth checking all other options 

Best regards,

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 08:13:09 -0600
From: Gary Neilson <gary at deepskyridge.com>
To: time-nuts at febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Fwd:  5370B Question / help needed
Message-ID: <0b65d3e6-c8d0-9eb8-fc70-f36c25ca8afb at deepskyridge.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

I have a 5370B from ebay, it was missing a couple of boards and had a
bad interpolator card. Also a bad input hybrid on the stop channel.

My unit acts similar to yours, TI measurement on the 10mhz signal shows
107 ns.

Frequency and Period measurement is spot on.

I think it needs an alignment performed. I will get to that soon.

Good Luck

Gary - K5DSR

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [time-nuts] 5370B Question / help needed
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2017 21:12:27 +0100
From: Thomas Allgeier <th.allgeier at gmail.com>
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
<time-nuts at febo.com>
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
<time-nuts at febo.com>

I got hold of a 5370B cheaply but it turns out it may have a fault:

Going through the motions of measuring TI with it's own 10MHz ref as input
(as described in the manual) I don't get 100 ns, but around 15 ns. So this
is with the switch set to START COM. Oddly enough I get the same 15 ns with
the switch set to SEP, and going through a 6 ft cable between start and

Now I can "tune" the thing to display 100 ns by changing the trigger
levels. Start at 0.6 V and stop at -0.1 V will achieve this. Once again
this does not change by going from COM to SEP i,e. by adding the 6 ft delay.

One other observation, probably related: After powerup it took several
vigorous switch activations of the COM/SEP switch before the thing swung
into action at all - i.e. the first reaction with COM setting was an Err
02, and with SEP I got the 15 ns as described above. So that switch may be
a bit dodgy.

Measuring in frequency mode gives the 10 MHz quite accurately, less than
1mHz off with its own ref as stop input. Feeding the 10 MHz in from my
GPSDO also ties up OK, it is around 40mHz off with perhaps 5-10mHz jitter.

Has anybody come across anything similar? I couldn't find much in that vein
in the archive but may have overlooked something. The one thing I was
worried about at first was the heat sinks at the rear getting really hot
but it seems I'm not the only one with that observation.

To some extent it looks like the input levels for triggering are off, but
then the fact that the 6 ft cable don't show up as extra delay may mean
there is something else wrong.

Looks like some "fun with Bill and Dave" lies ahead if somebody can point
me in the right direction.

Thanks in advance,

More information about the time-nuts mailing list