[time-nuts] New ISO8601 ?

Ruslan Nabioullin rnabioullin at gmail.com
Thu Nov 23 23:05:07 EST 2017


So this new revision enables essentially for the encoding of ``ca.''?
Obviously the current revision allows for varying degrees of fixed
chronological granularity levels.

-Ruslan

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Dana Whitlow <k8yumdoober at gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe the phrase "circa 1967" fits the bill pretty well, although
> it may fall a little bit short of "...but it’s all a bit of a blur”.
>
> Dana
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at phk.freebsd.dk>
> wrote:
>
>> --------
>> In message <4BEC82C4-583E-4632-8589-D898CC2BD16F at n1k.org>, Bob kb8tq
>> writes:
>>
>> >I had never realized there was a format for expressing “I think it was
>> 1967 but it’s
>> >all a bit of a blur”.
>>
>> I think that is one of the major reasons for the revision.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
>> phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
>> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
>> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
>> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.



-- 
Ruslan Nabioullin
Wittgenstein Laboratories
rnabioullin at gmail.com
(508) 523-8535
50 Louise Dr.
Hollis, NH 03049


More information about the time-nuts mailing list