[time-nuts] What does determine the short term stability of an Rb vapor cell standard?
Bob kb8tq
kb8tq at n1k.org
Mon Mar 26 09:17:13 EDT 2018
Hi
> On Mar 26, 2018, at 2:18 AM, Attila Kinali <attila at kinali.ch> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 15:28:10 -0400
> Bob kb8tq <kb8tq at n1k.org> wrote:
>
>> Well, magnetic shielding, temperature coupling between cells, photo detector
>> noise floor, phase noise of the various signals, basic stability of the “ocxo” and
>> I’m sure a few other issues as well……
>
> The effects of those seem not to be that big. If you look at the
> phase noise plot of the measurements that John Miles did [1],
> it looks like the PRS10 comes very close to the 5065 for everything
> shorter than 1s. Which suggests, that they might have missed something
> in the control loop or set its constant too long.
Weill on the same basis I could say that the laser driven Rb’s I’ve evaluated have
not been all that great for stability. ….. Last time I checked, the best Rb’s out there
are flying in GPS satellites. There *are* papers on them.
Bob
>
> Attila Kinali
>
>
> [1] http://www.ke5fx.com/rb.htm
>
> --
> <JaberWorky> The bad part of Zurich is where the degenerates
> throw DARK chocolate at you.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list