[time-nuts] ✘NEO-M8N vs. NEO-M8T
Bob kb8tq
kb8tq at n1k.org
Mon May 21 14:00:41 EDT 2018
Hi
> On May 21, 2018, at 1:44 PM, Gary E. Miller <gem at rellim.com> wrote:
>
> Yo Bob!
>
> On Mon, 21 May 2018 13:41:08 -0400
> Bob kb8tq <kb8tq at n1k.org> wrote:
>
>> Ok, are you trying to hold close to UTC or simply have a second that
>> is as close to 1 second as possible?
>
> Yes. One follows the other.
Not really, you can have a source of seconds that are all within 0.1 ns of the right length but are
offset from UTC by 200 ns. ( stable but not accurate)
You can have a series of seconds that are all within 10 ns of UTC, but one may be 20 ns to short
and the next is 20 ns to long. ( accurate but not stable )
So, which of the two is more important?
Bob
>
> RGDS
> GARY
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
> gem at rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
>
> Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
> "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list