[time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 166, Issue 44

Dan Kemppainen dan at irtelemetrics.com
Mon May 21 16:15:40 EDT 2018


Mark,

Ditto this. On 6T's and M8T's both.

The 6T's do have an odd issue once in a while, right at the roll over 
limit from +10.whatever nS to -10.whatever nS, sometimes the sawtooth 
value comes in with the wrong sign.

We were playing with the 6T's in a GPSDO, against a good crystal it 
stuck out really well in the graph. A software check in the GPSDO looks 
for this and fixes it. Seemed like it happened about once a week to once 
a month type timeframe.

Have you noticed this in your hardware?

Dan


On 5/21/2018 3:21 PM, time-nuts-request at febo.com wrote:
> Message: 10
> Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 19:21:25 +0000
> From: Mark Sims<holrum at hotmail.com>
> To:"time-nuts at febo.com"  <time-nuts at febo.com>
> Subject: [time-nuts] NEO-M8N vs. NEO-M8T
> Message-ID:
> 	<SN1PR11MB1024D7811062897BD74308EECE950 at SN1PR11MB1024.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
> 	
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> It looks like you have slipped a decimal point somewhere (also that "ps" label is wrong).   I have an M8N running here and the report sawtooth errors are all within a ± 10 ns span.   (and LEA-5T is ± 5ns).


More information about the time-nuts mailing list