[time-nuts] Cesium 133 on kickstarter
gchafee at gmail.com
Fri Apr 11 13:19:20 UTC 2014
I wonder if a CSAC used as a wristwatch would need constant C-field
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Attila Kinali <attila at kinali.ch> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:43:13 -0400
> Ronald Held <ronaldheld at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am curious what people think of this watch at least from the time-nut
> Considering that they are not the first, but at least the third with
> that idea (see archives for other CSAC wrist watches).
> But seriously, a modern, temperature compensated quartz watch goes better
> than +/-10s in half a year (about 1ppm), which is already about as good as
> need for a wrist watch. Any better is just unnecessary overengineering.
> Of course, it's a different matter if you like to show of to your peers.
> Other than that, i probably would buy a CSAC and put it into some equipment
> instead. :-)
> Attila Kinali
> I pity people who can't find laughter or at least some bit of amusement in
> the little doings of the day. I believe I could find something ridiculous
> even in the saddest moment, if necessary. It has nothing to do with being
> superficial. It's a matter of joy in life.
> -- Sophie Scholl
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com