[time-nuts] Caveats on Allan Deviation with ultra stable oscillators
tshoppa at gmail.com
Fri May 30 18:03:41 UTC 2014
What did NIST do with its Rubidium ensemble before they got the cesium fountain?
Did they break one of the rubidiums off the ensemble, maybe in a
different room with different HVAC, and look at the one vs many?
Would that be useful for OCXO's, measuring one OCXO against an ensemble?
On 5/30/14, cdelect at juno.com <cdelect at juno.com> wrote:
> I usually don't use drift removal as I want to see the effects of drift!
> The effects of oscillators locking together are very apparent on both the
> phase and AD plots when using a DMTD system. There was no indications of
> such locking!
> My point was that if you are measuring ultrastable Quartz oscillators
> against each other the AD at the higher Tau will not reflect the true
> stability of the oscillators.
> Only a Maser or high performance Rubidium (HP5065A) will reveal the true
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com