[time-nuts] Timelab, two SR620s and losing samples
attila at kinali.ch
Sun Jan 17 09:54:18 UTC 2016
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 07:24:32 +0100
Magnus Danielson <magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org> wrote:
> >> Have you tried swapping "role" of the SR620?
> > Yes, I've done that. Both SR620's lose some samples, but only one of
> > them loses significantly more than the other.
> OK. So, the dropping follows the counter rather than the role?
> >> Have you tried grabbing data in the Linux environment?
> > Nope. I couldn't find any tool for linux that worked.
> > I also tried to run Timelabs in Wine, but that segfaults on start.
> > Do you have any recommendation for a tool?
> You don't need anything fancy. A small program to talk to the serial
> port should do it. If you could use talk only, I would just pipe it to a
> file and compare them later.
Hmm.. good idea.
> I really wish TimeLab existed directly on Linux. Last time I tried
> running it under Wine, it worked but didn't draw things properly for me.
It's like Lady Heather, it needs to be ported to Qt ;-)
> >> Have you tried feeding timelab two streams generated on the linux side?
> > What do you mean by that?
> If you generate data that looks like real data and then mock the serial
> ports to make TimeLab beleive it is real counters, you can now see if
> the dataflow themselves causes issues over the Linux/Windows border and
> into TimeLab.
Ah.. unfortunately this would need a bit more fiddling and tool building
than I have time for. I'm only here for another week and have to spend
most of the time learning how to do ASICs.
> > Due to the problems I had with the SR620s and what the group at the TU Vienna
> > experienced (I am currently using their equipment), we started to ponder
> > whether we should build our own, multi-input TICs. Especially considering
> > that we are about to design some ASICs which we expect to be synced up
> > better than 100ps (somewhere around 20-50ps, limited by the delay uncertainty
> > of the cables).
> Well, building your own TIC would naturally be interesting, but adds
> another aspect in that you will have to verifiy them extensively. It
> will be another factor of uncertainty to consider.
Yes. It wouldn't be something that is done fast. I expect it to take
at least half a year with a couple of highly motivated people as a team.
A year would be probably more realistic. And after that, comes a whole
lot of verification and qualification. But that could probably be done
together with PTB or CERN.
It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All
the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no
use without that foundation.
-- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com