[time-nuts] Tom Van Baak: a conversation about GPS timing
eaguayo at thinksrs.com
Tue Jan 26 17:58:58 UTC 2016
Hello Time-nuts mailing list,
Let me introduce myself, my name is Tani Aguayo, I am a physicist
working on precision clocks for Stanford Research Systems (SRS). We had
the pleasure of having Tom Van Baak visit our lab yesterday, and I want
to write down some of the topics we talked about, and I thought this
list would be a good place to keep it, and share it. And also have Tom
go over it, and correct me if I got something wrong.
We talked GPS, and here is a couple of thought inducing comments from Tom:
Q: Why is there an timing offset of 20ns average between identical
commercial off-the-shelf GPS modules?
TVB: A low-cost (~$25-$50) GPS receiver gathers timing information via a
data lock to the local oscillator in the receiver, meaning the the
timing information is based on data passed to the receiver and then the
receiver uses that to produce a signal based on its own oscillator. This
is one part of what can explain the differences between units, the
stability of the receiver local clock will mask the precision timing of
the GPS 1 pps. The other part is that this timing data is based on the
GPS antenna parameters, and so any disturbing effects (i.e. cable
tempcos, impedance mismatches, active filtering in the antenna that
could introduce group delays... ) on the transmission path from antenna
to receiver, will affect the timing precision of the GPS 1pps at the
receiver with respect to UTC. This effect could change from unit to
unit, as different antennas would have different effects on the signal.
Q: When it comes to using a GPSDO to measure timing performance (Sigma
-Tau) any hiccups on GPS could make this calculation fail and you would
not know until after the fact, is there a way around this dependence?
TVB: It is hard to get a beautiful 10MHz and see how in a matter of
days, the timing quality is lost due to aging, tempcos, GPS hiccups...
you name it. A better approach is to keep a log of your clock against
GPS (without locking to it) and use an offline approach to compute your
timing performance (Sigma-Tau) and this way you can look at your clock
performance without mixing the GPS locking loop parameters.
Thank Tom for sharing this insight with us!
- Tani Aguayo
More information about the Time-nuts_lists.febo.com