[time-nuts] More Z3801/Tbolt comparisons
GandalfG8 at aol.com
GandalfG8 at aol.com
Fri Sep 4 11:36:35 UTC 2009
In a message dated 04/09/2009 11:18:07 GMT Daylight Time,
phill.r1 at btinternet.com writes:
Racal 19## Counters are something else - - I got rid of
mine some years back, not only the ongoing problems with the key-pad, but
I
don't think they put much cost into the oven osc. Perhaps you should
consider moving on to an HP or other quality counter, "you deserve it"
--------------
Even the best counters can sometimes suffer from poor internal oscillators.
The basic onboard oscillator in the HP53132A for example has no practical
use whatsoever, other than to demonstrate that the counter is functional,
but I suspect most, if not all, list members will generally be operating
counters with external references anyway
Whilst I wouldn't even consider swapping my 53132A for a 199x I must be a
glutton for punishment as I've just bought another 1991 after also selling
my previous one some time ago.
Aside from the reported key pad problems, which haven't affected me so far,
and the lesser resolution, it's a good solid workhorse and, something not
to be sneezed at, this one in very good condition cost me at least 80% less
than I'd expect to pay for a similar condition 53132A:-)
Earlier 19xx counters also strike me as being underrated these days.
Although it's lacking in resolution for most of my current needs I've still
got a 1905 I bought new in the late 70s/early 80s and that has served me
very well as a general purpose counter.
I'd suggest that too as an excellent workhorse and more than adequate for
such things as transmitter or receiver adjustment etc and, at the give-away
prices the 1904 and 1905 often seem to fetch on Ebay, they can be quite a
bargain.
regards
Nigel
GM8PZR
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list