[time-nuts] WWVB Measurements

paul swed paulswedb at gmail.com
Mon Mar 28 02:07:35 UTC 2011


Indeed those posts are from 2003 the car plant could be closed these days.
But I do indeed receive wwvb I think pretty well with a loop and preamp. Its
always been a challenge on the east coast and even Michigan when I first
started tinkering way to many years ago.
Pretty much before all these switching power supplies and cpfls etc.
Regards

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net> wrote:

>
> brooke at pacific.net said:
> > John Mills (THE NTP guru) has written a number of papers on and built
> > examples of a matched filter type receiver for the HF station WWV, but
>  the
> > ideas would also be applicable to a WWVB receiver.  The performance  he
> gets
> > from WWV would knock your socks off so I expect a WWVB version  would be
> > even better.  In addition there are some things that could be  done to
> > improve it.
>
> I assume you mean Dave Mills rather than John.
>  http://www.ece.udel.edu/~mills/index.html
>
> He's basically given up on WWVB.  In his area, there is too much crap
> around
> 60 KHz, mostly from switching power supplies.
>  http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions/2003-August/000106.html
>  http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions/2006-April/009958.html
>
>
>
> --
> These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>


More information about the time-nuts mailing list